Legal Opinion

Young v. Cockman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 4, 1943No. [No. 16, October Term, 1943.]PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.

Hattie Mae Cockman, widow, of Baltimore, in a suit for discovery, specific performance and injunction against Barbara E. Young, of New York, and McCormick & Company, a body corporate, alleges in her bill of complaint (1) that she married James A. Cockman in July, 1939, but they became estranged and for a long time lived apart; (2) that in September, 1940, her husband,, ill and requiring nursing, promised he would give her property valued at §6,000 if she would take him back in her home; and on February 18, 1941, in fulfillment of that promise, he and Mrs. Young, his daughter by a previous…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Whalen v. MilhollandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  2. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Frame v. FrameTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hendrickson v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  5. In Re Bauernschmidt's EstateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Weil v. WeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Columbian Carbon Co. v. KightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  3. Berman v. LecknerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Borchert v. BorchertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Kintzinger v. MillinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API