Creighbaum v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
Two issues are presented on this appeal:
1. Does the failure of the trial court to advise on the potential sentence compel a reversal as a matter of law?
2. Applying the totality of circumstances test, were the waiver of counsel and the pleas of guilty freely, voluntarily and understandingly made?
Defendant contends that the failure to advise him of the possible maximum penalty he might receive under the charges brought against him compels a reversal as a matter of law, not because the defendant did not know, but simply because the trial court failed to so state.
In support of his contention, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Browne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Pulaski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Burnett v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Carl Walter Aiken v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ernst v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Edwards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GouldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. RockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Hatcher v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.