Chandler v. Robinett
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. Frank J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for the sum of $1,035.38, and in due time defendant appealed from the judgment, and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial. Both appeals are before this court upon one transcript.
The action was brought to recover an alleged indebtedness to the McCloud River Lumber Company, a corporation, in the sum of $1,035.38 as a balance due and unpaid upon an open book account for lumber sold and delivered to defendant by said corporation.
It was alleged that the said corporation, prior to the commencement of this action, sold, assigned, and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchwenkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- New Jersey Zinc & Iron Co. v. Lehigh Zinc & Iron Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Read v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Baldridge v. PenlandTexas Supreme Court · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams v. Grogan-Cochran Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- State v. BrassfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Argue v. Monte Regio Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. Ocean Park Scenic Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Reiff v. Nebraska-California Colony Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.