Legal Opinion

Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. Ocean Park Scenic Railway Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 11, 1916No. Civ. No. 1803PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The defendant’s appeal is from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover an alleged balance due to the plaintiff for lumber sold and delivered to the defendant. It was found by the court that the plaintiff sold and delivered to defendant lumber of the value of $2,875.15, of which sum two thousand dollars was paid by the defendant. Appellant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the finding that any lumber was delivered exceeding in value the amount paid. The controversy between the parties relates to the quantity of lumber delivered, and not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chan Kiu Sing v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Chandler v. RobinettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Atkinson v. Western Development SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
  2. Preston v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. People v. TagawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API