Legal Opinion

Argue v. Monte Regio Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1931No. Docket No. 6825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff, assignee of a copartnership, filed his complaint on August 14, 1928, stating two causes of action against defendant corporation and others, the first for an indebtedness of $1,000 on an open book account for legal services rendered by plaintiff’s assignor, and the second an account stated for the same services and amount. The defendant Monte Regio Corporation filed its answer and the case was tried against such defendant alone on the issues raised by said complaint and answer. The second cause of action was expressly abandoned by plaintiff during the course of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Yolo Water & Power Co. v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Levine v. Lancashire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Woods Lumber Co. v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Cowdery v. McChesneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Palpar, Inc. v. ThayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Davis v. EdmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API