Legal Opinion
Discuillo v. Stone & Webster
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 24, 1996No. 14863PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the compensation review board (board) dismissing the plaintiffs claim for compensation benefits. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the board improperly determined that the plaintiff failed to file a notice of claim in a timely manner as required by General Statutes (Rev. to 1981) § 31-294.1 We affirm the judgment of the board.
*225The commissioner found the following facts. Prior to November 12,1982, the plaintiff was employed by the defendant, Stone & Webster,2 as a painter. The plaintiff s responsibilities required him to climb ladders and to work on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Six v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Williams v. Best Cleaners, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Borent v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Housing Authority v. OlesenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Infante v. Mansfield Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Paternostro v. Arborio Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Knapp v. City of New LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Veilleux v. Complete Interior Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.