Legal Opinion
Knapp v. City of New London
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 18, 1997No. 15257PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming the order of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) dismissing his claim for workers’ compensation benefits. The dispositive issue in this case is whether the board properly determined that the plaintiff failed to file a timely notice of claim as required by General Statutes § 31-294c (a).1 We affirm the decision of the board.
On October 25, 1991, the plaintiff filed a notice of claim alleging that noise exposure at work damaged his hearing. The named defendant city2 challenged this claim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fair v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Borent v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Discuillo v. Stone & WebsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryan v. Sheraton-Hartford HotelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Benedetto v. BenedettoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Hebert v. RWA, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Masko v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Gyadu v. D'Addario Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999