Legal Opinion

Austin v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1925No. 7442. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Appellees sued appellant to enjoin him from further violating the terms of restrictions contained as covenants in a contract under which appellant held, owned and possessed certain premises in what is known as the Woods and Paschal subdivision, block 1752, facing south on East Park avenue, in the city of San Antonio. Under the covenants and restrictions in the deed under which appellant held it is alleged that the addition was pldtted out and put on the market for sale with the general plan and intention of making of it an exclusive residential district for private homes only, and that under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curlee v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Schadt v. BrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Sayles v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  4. Elterich v. Leicht Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Wilson Co. v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Plaster v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Austin v. RichardsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Cooke v. KinkeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Plaster v. StutzmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API