Legal Opinion

Austin v. Richardson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 1, 1926No. 842-4556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

Defendants in error by this suit seek to enjoin E. L. Austin, plaintiff in error, and H. Rabe and Samuel Dreyfus, from violating the terms of restrictions contained as covenants in a deed under which Rabe and Dreyfus owned, and Austin now owns, lot No. 5 and the west one-half of lot No. 6, now city block No. 1752, in the city of San Antonio, Bexar county, Tex. In the amended petition upon which the case was tried defendants in error alleged that Rabe, who was the owner of said land at the time this suit was filed, and had a two-story residence thereon, which he was occupying and using as a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schwarzschild v. WelborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
  2. Foster v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Couch v. Southampton Civic ClubCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Gillingham v. TimminsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Walbey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API