Legal Opinion

State v. Felton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 9, 1973No. 52PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

The defendant’s statement of his case on appeal includes seven assignments of error. Assignments 1 and 7 are not brought forward into his brief and no argument or citation of authorities was made in support of either. These assignments are, therefore, deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court of North Carolina; State v. Boyd, 278 N.C. 682, 180 S.E. 2d 794; State v. Greene, 278 N.C. 649, 180 S.E. 2d 789; State v. Dawson, 278 N.C. 351, 180 S.E. 2d 140; State v. Benton, 276 N.C. 641, 174 S.E. 2d 793.

In any event, these two assignments have no merit.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. StanleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API