Legal Opinion

Peers v. Stoll

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1939No. Civ. 11043PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

In an action brought to foreclose a mortgage the defendants defaulted, a decree in favor of the plaintiffs was entered, a sale was had, and a deficiency judgment for $3,149.50 was entered April 5, 1918. No other proceedings were had until August 4, 1937, when the above-named plaintiffs applied to the court for an order - directing execution to issue. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 685.) They served and filed a written notice of their motion and at the same time served and filed an affidavit by G. R. Soule, the assignee of the judgment, in support of their motion. Thereafter the defendants served and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gay v. TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Hecq v. ConnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Perez v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Long v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Lundgren v. LundgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API