Legal Opinion

Perez v. Perez

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1952No. Civ. 14958PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Two appeals from separate orders granting defendant’s motion to recall execution and strike alimony provisions from an interlocutory decree of divorce are presented together.

The first point raised by the appellant is that the court was without jurisdiction to hear the motion because the notice thereof did not state the grounds upon which it would be made as required by section 1010 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The point is without merit. In participating in the hearing and in failing to object to the form of the notice the question of its sufficiency was waived. Hecq v. Conner, 203 Cal.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re Guardianship of the Person & Estate of SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Waller v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Reimer v. FirpoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Reifler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Beckett v. Kaynar Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Farner v. FarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Taliaferro v. HoogsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API