Beck v. Camden Place at Tuttle Crossing, Unpublished Decision (6-10-2004)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Charles and Jane Beck (hereinafter collectively "appellants"), appeal from the decision and judgment directing a verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, Camden Place at Tuttle Crossing (hereinafter "Camden Place" or "appellee"). For the reasons which follow, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On April 19, 1997, Charles Beck accompanied his daughter Tracy Mellis to Camden Place to assist her in finding an apartment. Upon arriving, they entered the clubhouse-leasing office (hereinafter "office") and spoke with leasing agent, Shannon Rigo. Ms.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
- Presley v. City of NorwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Anderson v. JancoaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Arnett v. MongOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Rowe v. PseekosOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cippolone v. Hoffmeier, C-060482 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hidalgo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.