Legal Opinion

Beck v. Camden Place at Tuttle Crossing, Unpublished Decision (6-10-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 2004No. 02AP-1370UnpublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Charles and Jane Beck (hereinafter collectively "appellants"), appeal from the decision and judgment directing a verdict in favor of defendant-appellee, Camden Place at Tuttle Crossing (hereinafter "Camden Place" or "appellee"). For the reasons which follow, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} On April 19, 1997, Charles Beck accompanied his daughter Tracy Mellis to Camden Place to assist her in finding an apartment. Upon arriving, they entered the clubhouse-leasing office (hereinafter "office") and spoke with leasing agent, Shannon Rigo. Ms.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strother v. HutchinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Paschal v. Rite Aid Pharmacy, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Simmers v. Bentley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Presley v. City of NorwoodOhio Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. JancoaOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Arnett v. MongOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Rowe v. PseekosOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Cippolone v. Hoffmeier, C-060482 (7-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Hidalgo v. Costco Wholesale Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API