Legal Opinion

Anderson Heating, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 11, 1961No. C. D. 2301PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Judge:

This ease raises the question of the proper rate of duty to be applied to an importation of portable heaters. These articles were classified by the collector of customs at the port of entry as household utensils, within the purview of paragraph 339 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and, accordingly, were assessed with duty at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem.

Certain other articles, claimed to be parts of the involved heaters, were assessed with…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kroder Reubel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. United States v. Ellis Silver Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Shoten v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. D. E. Sanford Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Turner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lipman's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Canion v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Canion v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Gloy's Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API