Legal Opinion

Gutz v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 23, 1999No. 98-785LPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The above captioned case is presently before this court on cross motions for summary judgment. In 1993, plaintiffs James C. Gutz and Arlene Gutz filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska challenging administrative determinations of the Soil Conservation Service (SCS). In 1994, the parties entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the dispute and the case was dismissed. The plaintiffs now claim that the government breached the agreement by failing to pay $17,471.00 due under the agreement. Plaintiffs also claim that the government was…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. George Sollitt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. CEMS, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Davidson v. VenemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Modeer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Greenhill v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API