Legal Opinion
Greenhill v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 31, 2011No. 07-854 CPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
Plaintiff requests $83,750 in attorneys’ fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (docket entry 115, July 14, 2010) (“Pl.’s Mot.”). Plaintiff also filed a bill of costs seeking $1,793.36 for costs incident to the taking of four depositions (docket entry 114, July 14, 2010). See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Defendant contends that plaintiff is not entitled to any award of attorneys’ fees, but if she is, the amount of the award must be substantially reduced (docket entries 116 & 117, Aug. 16, 2010) (“Def.’s…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Broekelschen v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
- DGR Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Sabo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Standard Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.