Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph J. Pavlico

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1992No. 90-6629PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Joseph J. Pavlico appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina denying his Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion challenging the legality of the sentence that court imposed upon him following convictions under the federal false statements and mail fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1341. Pavlico claims (1) that the district court improperly considered the perjurious trial testimony of himself and his wife in fixing his sentence; (2) that the district court took personal offense at certain testimony of Pavlico’s wife,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. United States v. Michael Aaron LittleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API