Legal Opinion
Brittingham v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided January 23, 1998No. 228 and 336, 1997PublishedCited by 303 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
The defendant-appellant, Edward A Brit-tingham (“Brittingham”), was found guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree by a New Castle County jury on September 18, 1991. He was declared to be an habitual criminal and sentenced to fifteen years of incarceration. Brittingham’s conviction and sentence were affirmed on appeal by this Court. Brittingham v. State, Del.Supr., No. 486, 1991, Veasey, C.J., 1992 WL 219205 (July 31, 1992) (ORDER). Brittingham filed a motion for posteonviction relief. This Court affirmed the Superior Court judgment denying that motion. Brittingham v. State,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- United States v. John R. MazakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- United States v. Joseph J. PavlicoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by303 opinions
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Hoskins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
- Hudak v. ProcekSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.