Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Aaron Little
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 22, 2004No. 03-6681PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Authorization denied to file a successive § 2255 motion; petition for § 2241 writ dismissed without prejudice by published opinion. Judge WILLIAMS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS and Judge CONRAD joined.
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
In a case presenting several procedural conundrums, Michael Little, a federal pris oner, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under former Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(a) to correct an illegal sentence. 1 We construe Little’s Rule 35(a) motion as a request to file a successive habeas petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 &…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Rumsfeld v. PadillaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- United States v. UrutyanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Coughlin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Higgs v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- United States v. PalmerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States v. Brandon CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.