Legal Opinion
Ledex, Inc. v. Heatbath Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 18, 1984No. 83-1146PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The question presented is whether R.C. 4123.82 bars an employer whose employee suffers injuries and recovers workers’ compensation therefor from recovering damages for increased workers’ compensation premiums from a third party whose conduct caused the employee’s injuries. This issue has vexed this court for decades.
R.C. 4123.82 states in pertinent part as follows:
“(A) All contracts and agreements are void which undertake to indemnify or insure an employer against loss or liability for the payment of compensation to workmen or their dependents for death, injury, or occupational disease…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oliver v. Kaiser Community Health FoundationOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Truscon Steel Co. v. Trumbull Cliffs Furnace Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
- Midvale Coal Co. v. Cardox Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by19 opinions
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Glaspell v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Higbie Roth Construction Co. v. Houston Shell & Concrete, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Iron Workers Local Union No. 17 Insurance Fund v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.