Legal Opinion

Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1923No. 3739PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

This writ presents the single question whether a manufacturer of electricity doing business in Ohio, and who had complied with the Workmen’s Compensation Act of that state, and had elected, under section 1465-69 of the Ohio General Code, to pay directly the compensation required by law to be paid to such of its employés as should be injured in the course of their employment, in lieu of paying premiums to the Industrial Commission, and had accordingly been compelled to pay directly to its employé, on account of injuries sustained by the latter in the course of his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Boston Woven Hose & Rubber Co. v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Inter-State Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Service Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. United States Casualty Co. v. Hercules Powder Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Strait Scale Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  5. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. StraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API