Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bennett v. Lime

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1978No. 77-1366PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.

The main issue raised by this cause is whether a writ of mandamus should issue to compel the city to pay relators their full salaries as police officers for the period they are on active military duty.

Two of the relator-appellants have already been allowed to pursue declaratory judgment relief in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, and the third could have been joined in that action and can be joined in any appeal of that action. Civ. R. 21.

“Neither this court nor the Court of Appeals has discretion to decline jurisdiction of an action in mandamus. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Dollison v. ReddyOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Findlay Publishing Co. v. SchroederOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Fattlar v. BoyleOhio Supreme Court · 1998

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API