Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hallett

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1981No. 5263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Ronald and Donna Hallett sued Merle Davis, in a dispute over title to real property. The Halletts prevailed, and were awarded $11,519.15 for their attorney’s fees. The award was made by Superior Court Judge Victor Carlson, pursuant to Rule 82(a)(2), Alaska Rules of Civil procedure. 1 In Davis v. Hallett, 587 P.2d 1170 (Alaska 1978), we reversed, stating:

It is well-settled in the decisions of this court that the purpose of Rule 82 is to compensate a prevailing party only partially for attorney fees justifiably incurred. See, e. g., Malvo v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., 512…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Davis v. HallettAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. SalinasAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. GilesUtah Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moeller-Prokosch v. ProkoschAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Preston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Christianson Construction Co. v. Isaacson Structural Steel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API