Davis v. Hallett
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BURKE, Justice.
Ronald and Donna Hallett sued Merle Davis, in a dispute over title to real property. The Halletts prevailed, and were awarded $11,519.15 for their attorney’s fees. The award was made by Superior Court Judge Victor Carlson, pursuant to Rule 82(a)(2), Alaska Rules of Civil procedure. 1 In Davis v. Hallett, 587 P.2d 1170 (Alaska 1978), we reversed, stating:
It is well-settled in the decisions of this court that the purpose of Rule 82 is to compensate a prevailing party only partially for attorney fees justifiably incurred. See, e. g., Malvo v. J. C. Penney Company, Inc., 512…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Davis v. HallettAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. SalinasAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. GilesUtah Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moeller-Prokosch v. ProkoschAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Enders v. ParkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Williams v. CrawfordAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Preston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Christianson Construction Co. v. Isaacson Structural Steel Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1982