Legal Opinion

State v. Salinas

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1961No. 101PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this petition for review is whether the superior court has jurisdiction to grant a new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence, after an appellate court has affirmed a judgment of conviction and issued a mandate ordering the defendant to be taken into custody, but has not remanded the case to the superior court for the purpose of granting a new trial.

Respondent was indicted for the crime of arson in the first degree on February 24, 1958 and convicted of arson in the second degree in the United States District Court for the District (Territory) of Alaska,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Elrick Rim Co. v. Reading Tire Machinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Andrew Pitts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Hershey Mfg. Co. v. AdamowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Zamloch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. BrowderAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Patrick v. SedwickAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Salinas v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. KaatzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. SheppardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API