Legal Opinion

Enders v. Parker

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 2005No. S-11437PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska Statute 13.16.435 entitles personal representatives who litigate in “good faith” to recover attorney’s fees and costs from the estate. Iris Enders was a personal representative who unsuccessfully challenged Joel Kottke’s 1997 will. She argues here that it was error to deny her request, for attorney’s fees and costs under the statute. Because the good faith required by AS 13.16.435 is implied, but not conclusively established, by the existence of “reasonably arguable grounds” for a will challenge, and because good faith requires that a personal…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hartmarx Corporation v. A. Robert Abboud, Spencer Hays, Tom James CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Khalsa v. CHOSEAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Dieringer v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Williams v. FagnaniAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API