MYRTLE MEWS ASS'N, INC. v. Bordes
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., 1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Myrtle Mews Association, Inc., and, more particularly, from the denial of the defendant’s motion to open the judgment of strict foreclosure. The defendant claims that the court erred in denying its motion to open because the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it as a result of insufficiency of process and insufficient service of process, thus rendering the judgment void. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff commenced this action on…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Ryan v. CerulloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Argent Mortgage Co. v. HuertasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Phoenix Leasing, Inc. v. KosinskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- HIGHGATE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N, INC. v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Nichols v. Milford Pediatric Group, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- TD Bank, N.A. v. SalceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Investment Associates v. Summit Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- State v. CustodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.