Legal Opinion
State v. Custodio
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 15, 2011No. AC 32527PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Pedro Custodio, appeals from the judgment of the trial court committing him to the custody of the commissioner of mental health and addiction services (commissioner) and requiring him to submit to periodic competency evaluations pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 2009) § 54-56d (m). The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) concluded that § 54-56d (m), as amended by Public Acts 1998, No. 98-88, § 2 (act), applies retroactively, (2) concluded that it possessed personal jurisdiction over him, (3) ordered him to submit to periodic competency…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Moore v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Villages, LLC v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Citizens Against Overhead Power Line Construction v. Connecticut Siting CouncilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Holmes v. Hartford HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. CustodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011