Legal Opinion

Donald Knight and Foster Pepper & Shefelman, a Law Partnership, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. The United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 6, 1993No. 91-1454, 91-1488 and 92-1112PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Chief Judge.

The United States appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska (entered June 10, 1991), in Civil Action No. A90-093, awarding Foster Pepper & Shefelman (Foster Pepper) $4,054.42, pursuant to an Alaska attorney’s lien statute, for administrative advocacy on behalf of four employees (of which Knight is one) of the Department of the Interior. 1 Knight and Foster Pepper (collectively, “plaintiffs”) cross-appeal seeking to obtain awards under the Back Pay Act, the Equal Access to Justice Act, and a “common fund” theory. We conclude that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Keith Winston Watters v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Brenda Blocker, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Applegate v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Morganroth & Morganroth v. DeLoreanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Sandoval v. ApfelDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2000

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API