Legal Opinion

Haggart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 8, 2016No. 2014-5106PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACH, Circuit Judge.

Appellants Gordon and Denise Woodley (“Woodleys”) challenge the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Claims Court”) approving a settlement agreement in a class action takings suit and awarding attorney fees to class counsel under the common fund doctrine. The United States (“Government”) confesses error for failing to support the Woodleys’ claim before the Claims Court and, like the Woodleys, now asserts the Claims Court erred in approving the settlement agreement and awarding class counsel attorney fees under the common fund doctrine. For the reasons…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Biery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Robert McKeage v. TMBC, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Tim Brundle v. Wilmington Trust, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. Starry Associates, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API