Legal Opinion

Morganroth & Morganroth v. DeLorean

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2000No. 98-4125PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellees Mayer Morganroth and his law firm, Morganroth and Morgan-roth (hereafter Morganroth), filed this diversity suit to set aside a transfer of property as fraudulent. Morganroth pleaded three theories for relief, but the only one which is relevant to this appeal is the theory that the transfer of the property should be set aside under Utah Code Ann. § 25-6-6(1) (1998). That statute deems a transfer fraudulent without requiring proof of actual intent to defraud when the transfer is not made for a reasonably equivalent value; the transferor is either…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Phelps v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Stewart v. Utah Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. TW Telecom Holdings Inc. v. Carolina Internet Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S.A. v. Hearthside Baking Company, Inc., D/B/A Maurice Lenell Cooky CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Petrella v. BrownbackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  5. Drumheller v. DrumhellerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API