Legal Opinion

Renner v. Nemitz

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 2001No. 00-619PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 The appellant, David Nemitz (Nemitz), appeals from an order of the District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District, Custer County, finding a prescriptive easement over his property in favor of the respondent, James G. Renner (Renner). We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 We address the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in finding a prescriptive easement over Nemitz’s property in favor of Renner?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in finding the prescriptive easement was not abandoned?

¶5 3. Did the District Court err in finding that the prescriptive easement was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Unified Industries, Inc. v. EasleyMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Daines v. KnightMontana Supreme Court · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WhitehornMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Albert v. HastetterMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Nelson v. BrooksMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Harding v. SavoyMontana Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API