State v. Finley
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
Daniel Felix Finley (Finley) appeals from the judgment and commitment entered by the Twentieth Judicial District Court, Lake County, for sexual intercourse without consent and for burglary. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ISSUES
1. Did the prosecutor violate Finley’s right to due process and privilege against self-incrimination by commenting on his postarrest silence and is this issue reviewable under the common law plain error doctrine?
2. Did the District Court err in failing to conduct a hearing on Finley’s complaints about…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by229 opinions
- State v. GallagherMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WarclubMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WeaverMontana Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. RoslingMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WestMontana Supreme Court · 2008
224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.