Legal Opinion

Ray v. Nansel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2002No. 01-780PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Jerry T. Ray appeals from a Judgment of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County. Gayle B. Nansel, Paul G. Bromenshenk, Darlene F. Bromenshenk, the Zimmerman Family Limited Partnership and John Does 1 through 10 (collectively, the “Defendants”) cross-appeal from the District Court’s Memorandum and Order. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 The following issues are dispositive of this appeal:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in concluding that Ray had failed to prove a prescriptive easement over the Bromenshenk Property?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in concluding…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eschenbacher v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Guthrie v. HardyMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Carkeek v. AyerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Kuhlman v. RiveraMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Renner v. NemitzMontana Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anderson v. StokesMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re the Mental Health of A.S.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. SartainMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Byrum v. AndrenMontana Supreme Court · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API