Legal Opinion

Albert v. Hastetter

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2002No. 00-724PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Erika Hastetter (Hastetter) appeals the determination by the Seventh Judicial District Court, Richland County, that a roadway providing access to and egress from a half-section of pasture owned by Lewis A. Albert (Albert) is subject to a prescriptive easement, enuring to the benefit of Albert. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 Albert acquired the following described half-section of land, which is the dominant tenement in this action, from his mother by contract for deed in November 1958:

Township 20 North, Range 59 East, M.P.M.

Section 2: E Vi

Albert used the land solely for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gloria Rios v. F. Calvin Bigler, M.D. And Lauren A. Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Wareing v. SchreckendgustMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Public Lands Access Ass'n v. Boone & Crockett Club Foundation, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lugtig v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  5. J. H. Harvey Co. v. ReddickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ray v. NanselMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. MONTANA PROFESSIONAL SPORTS, LLC. v. National Indoor Football League, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. BrantleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. Bobby CookseyMontana Supreme Court · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API