Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Johnson v. Gebhardt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1901PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. J. L. Fort, Judge. (1) The charges contained in the petition or information are too vague, indefinite and uncertain to apprise the defendant of what charges he was called upon to meet and defend against General.and vague charges are not sufficient to disbar an attorney from the practice of his profession.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. J. L. Fort, Judge. (1) The charges contained in the petition or information are too vague, indefinite and uncertain to apprise the defendant of what charges he was called upon to meet and defend against General.and vague charges are not sufficient to disbar an attorney from the practice of his profession. Weeks on Attorneys, (2 Ed.), sec. 83; State v. Watkins, 3 Mo. 480; State ex rel. v. Finley, 30 Ela. 325; 18 L. R. A. 404; People v. Allison, 68 HI. 151; Dickerson v. Dustin, 21 Mich. 427; Walker v. Commonwealth (Ky.), 8 Bush. 86; Ex parte Smith, 28…

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

On the twentieth day of June, 1899, an information or petition was filed in the office of the cleric of the circuit court of Butler county, wherein the State of Missouri was plaintiff, H. E. Johnson relator, and E. D. Gebhardt defendant, the prayer of which was that the defendant be disbarred, his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and he thereby prevented from further practicing law in the courts of the State. The petition alleges that the defendant was licensed and admitted to practice by the Butler Circuit Court in November, 1893. That while acting as an attorney in the year 1898, he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. McClaughertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. State ex. rel. Wolfe v. KirkeSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  4. Ex parte SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. People ex rel. Moses v. GoodrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Proceedings Against Richards for DisbarmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. In Re the Disbarment of BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In re the Disbarment of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. In re Proceedings for the Disbarment of RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  5. State ex rel. Shackleford v. McElhinneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API