Legal Opinion

Ex parte Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1867PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from the JRandolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

— This is an appeal by Jeremiah Smith from the order and judgment of the Randolph Circuit Court, disbarring him from practicing as an attorney of said court, and ordering that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys thereof, for contempt.

The facts, as they appear by a bill of exceptions, are these: An action of slander (Burnworth v. Hiatt) was pending in said court, in which said Smith was attorney for the plaintiff. For the purpose of dismissing said action, on the 6th day of March, 1867, in the vacation of said court, said Smith wrote on the court docket, opposite the docket entry…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the case of YatesNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  3. State v. TiptonIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
  4. Johnston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Little v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. State v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ex parte WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. In re Proceedings to PeytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  5. State ex rel. McCormick v. WintonOregon Supreme Court · 1884

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API