Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tejeda

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 9, 2003PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MUSMANNO, J.:

¶ 1 Ricky Tejeda (“Tejeda”) appeals nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence imposed after his conviction of attempted criminal homicide, aggravated assault, simple assault, and reckless endangering of another. 1 We affirm.

¶ 2 Tejeda raises only one issue on appeal:

Did the trial judge commit an error of law when she failed to grant a mistrial upon motion of defense counsel and/or for reason of manifest ] necessity where [Tejeda’s] flagrant misbehavior was so prejudicial that it would be impossible for the finders of fact to arrive at an impartial verdict?

Brief for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. LeaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. AkbarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Com. v. Cox, V., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Commonwealth v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API