Commonwealth v. Tejeda
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
¶ 1 Ricky Tejeda (“Tejeda”) appeals nunc pro tunc from the judgment of sentence imposed after his conviction of attempted criminal homicide, aggravated assault, simple assault, and reckless endangering of another. 1 We affirm.
¶ 2 Tejeda raises only one issue on appeal:
Did the trial judge commit an error of law when she failed to grant a mistrial upon motion of defense counsel and/or for reason of manifest ] necessity where [Tejeda’s] flagrant misbehavior was so prejudicial that it would be impossible for the finders of fact to arrive at an impartial verdict?
Brief for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Paden v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. LeaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. AkbarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. HudsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Com. v. Cox, V., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. CaldwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.