Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Siebring
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided July 30, 1964No. Civ. No. 1118PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, District Judge.
On February 12, 1959, a patent in-ünfringement suit was instituted by ■Charles W. Hansen of Minnesota against Claude Siebring d/b/a Siebring Manufacturing Company at George, Iowa. 'The action was brought under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). That action ended in a consent decree filed October 19, 1959, • and a writ of permanent injunction filed October 30, 1959. A settlement agreement was filed as part of the consent ■decree.
On February 1, 1962, a motion for contempt was filed by Hansen against the ■original defendant. The defendant has resisted the motion for contempt.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- High Tech Medical Instrumentation, Inc. v. New Image Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Claude Siebring D/B/A Siebring Manufacturing Company, and Owen Siebring v. Charles W. Hansen and Afsco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- TGIP, Inc. v. AT & T Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
- Sunbeam Corporation v. SW Farber, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- McDermott v. Omid International Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988