Legal Opinion
McDermott v. Omid International Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided February 2, 1988No. Nos. C-2-84-1688, C-2-86-119PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
GRAHAM, District Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On May 24, 1976, Robert C. Ward filed an application for a United States patent. The invention described in the application is a binder material consisting of a grid-like frame coated with pressure sensitive adhesive. The binder is intended to be used for the purpose of fastening carpeting to a surface, such as a floor, in such a way that it can be easily removed without damage to carpeting or floor. A patent [No. 4,234,649] was issued to Ward on November 18, 1980 and subsequently assigned to the plaintiff, Lewis…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Perkin-Elmer Corporation, a Corporation of New York v. Computervision Corporation, a Corporation of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Peter Gabor Kalman v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995