Legal Opinion
Sunbeam Corporation v. SW Farber, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 19, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendants S. W. Farber, Inc., and Hoyt K. Foster move herein for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that there is no dispute between the parties as to any material question of fact. In opposition, plaintiff points to facts which it contends are material to the within action and which are in dispute. Plaintiff’s contentions have merit and the motion will accordingly be denied.
This is a civil action by plaintiff, the losing party, in an interference proceeding before the Patent Office brought pursuant to Section 146…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Blackford v. WilderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1907
- Ballantyne Instruments & Electronics, Inc. v. WagnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1964
- Ronel Corporation v. Anchor Lock of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Solomon v. RenstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- John S. Elliott and Fredda Caldwell Elliott v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Fujitsu Limited v. Sprague Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- E. I. duPont de Nemours & Co. v. Celanese Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- SEALECTRO CORPORATION v. LVC Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1967