TGIP, Inc. v. AT & T Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW,
RON CLARK, District Judge.
Plaintiff, TGIP Inc., claimed infringement of two patents relating to prepaid calling cards. The jury returned a verdict that was adverse in all respects to Defendant, AT & T Corporation, which timely made and renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on alternative grounds. [Docs. # 469, # 472, # 478, # 479, & # 512], AT & T’s three arguments for JMOL on the issue of nonin-fringement are summarized as follows:
a. The claims teach that the call authorization amount of a card or account is not…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Plumley v. MockettDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Ergotron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
- Versata Software, Inc. v. Internet Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
- Emtel, Inc. v. Lipidlabs, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.