Legal Opinion

TGIP, Inc. v. AT & T Corp.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided October 29, 2007No. 4:06-cr-00105PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW,

RON CLARK, District Judge.

Plaintiff, TGIP Inc., claimed infringement of two patents relating to prepaid calling cards. The jury returned a verdict that was adverse in all respects to Defendant, AT & T Corporation, which timely made and renewed motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) on alternative grounds. [Docs. # 469, # 472, # 478, # 479, & # 512], AT & T’s three arguments for JMOL on the issue of nonin-fringement are summarized as follows:

a. The claims teach that the call authorization amount of a card or account is not…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Plumley v. MockettDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  2. Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. Ergotron, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Versata Software, Inc. v. Internet Brands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2012
  4. Emtel, Inc. v. Lipidlabs, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  5. Honeywell International Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API