Legal Opinion

Ryker v. Stidham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 9, 1977No. 1887-2PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ringold, J. *

On November 25, 1971, plaintiffs sold vacant land to defendants Robert E. and Clarcy Stidham pursuant to a standard form of real estate contract common in this state. The purchase price was $28,285, with a down payment of $3,500, and the balance payable in monthly installments of $200 including interest on the diminishing balance. The contract contained the usual "time is of the essence" clause:

Time is of the essence of this contract, and it is agreed that in case the purchaser shall fail to comply with or perform any condition or agreement . . . the seller may elect to declare…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Moeller v. Good Hope Farms, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Walker v. McMurchieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Central Life Assurance Society v. ImpelmansWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Wadham v. McVicarWashington Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vacova Company v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  2. Terry v. BornCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Sofie v. KaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Barnett v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
  5. Rains v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API