Legal Opinion

Terry v. Born

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 19, 1979No. 6623-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether it was error for the tried judge to gremt a judgment on the pleadings and declare a forfeiture of a real estate contract. We hold that it was.

Plaintiffs Terry contracted to sell real property to defendemts Born, who agreed to pay the purchase price in monthly installments over a period of years. The contract did not permit prepayment by Born and it was "not assignable nor [could] ,the buyer convey the property without the seller's written consent." Exhibit 1.

When Born subsequently contracted to sell to defendants Rollins without Terry's…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Bellingham First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. John R. Hansen, Inc. v. Pacific International Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Bingaman v. Valley Savings & Loan AssociationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Morris v. WoodsideWashington Supreme Court · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API