Terry v. Born
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The question presented by this appeal is whether it was error for the tried judge to gremt a judgment on the pleadings and declare a forfeiture of a real estate contract. We hold that it was.
Plaintiffs Terry contracted to sell real property to defendemts Born, who agreed to pay the purchase price in monthly installments over a period of years. The contract did not permit prepayment by Born and it was "not assignable nor [could] ,the buyer convey the property without the seller's written consent." Exhibit 1.
When Born subsequently contracted to sell to defendants Rollins without Terry's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Dill v. ZielkeWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- Bellingham First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GarrisonWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- John R. Hansen, Inc. v. Pacific International Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tomlinson v. ClarkeWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Williams v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of ArlingtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Bingaman v. Valley Savings & Loan AssociationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- Morris v. WoodsideWashington Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.