Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Lora
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided July 10, 1997No. 96-P-623PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
A complaint charged the defendant, Orestes Lora, with a violation of G. L. c. 90, § 23. The second paragraph of the statute reads in pertinent part:
*137“Any person convicted of operating a motor vehicle after his license to operate has been suspended or revoked, . . . or after notice of the suspension or revocation of his right to operate a motor vehicle without a license has been issued by the registrar and received by such person or by his agent or employer, and prior to the restoration of such license . . . shall be punished . . . -”1
At trial by a jury of six in the Roxbury District Court, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BradshawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Commonwealth v. KoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DeramoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. NormanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. BlakeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. SilvaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.