Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kendall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 28, 2008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpina, J.

In this case, we consider whether the defendant, Clinton Kendall, was entitled to a jury instruction on the defense of necessity with respect to a charge of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor (OUI), G. L. c. 90, § 24 (1) (a) (1), where the defendant was driving in order to get his seriously injured girl friend to a hospital for medical care. A jury found the defendant guilty of OUI, and he *11was sentenced to two years of probation, with conditions.1 In an unpublished memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the District…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  4. Commonwealth v. HoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. BrugmannMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MagadiniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  2. City of Fargo v. NikleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. KnightMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
  4. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. LockwoodMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API