Commonwealth v. Silva
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1DissentLynch, J.
When the trial record is purged of the erroneously admitted hearsay testimony, see Commonwealth v. Alphas, 430 Mass. 8, 13 & n.6 (1999), the remaining evidence does not warrant a finding that the defendant had knowledge of the extended 209A order he is charged with violating, an essential element of the offense under G. L. c. 209A, § 7. See Commonwealth v. Collier, All Mass. 385, 388 (1998); Commonwealth v. Delaney, 425 Mass. 587, 595-596 (1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1058 (1998). That evidence consists of the 209A complaint form and order, both of which provide an address for the defendant,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. McGovernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. CrosscupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.