Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Silva

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 10, 2000Published

1DissentLynch, J.

When the trial record is purged of the erroneously admitted hearsay testimony, see Commonwealth v. Alphas, 430 Mass. 8, 13 & n.6 (1999), the remaining evidence does not warrant a finding that the defendant had knowledge of the extended 209A order he is charged with violating, an essential element of the offense under G. L. c. 209A, § 7. See Commonwealth v. Collier, All Mass. 385, 388 (1998); Commonwealth v. Delaney, 425 Mass. 587, 595-596 (1997), cert, denied, 522 U.S. 1058 (1998). That evidence consists of the 209A complaint form and order, both of which provide an address for the defendant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MirandaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. DelaneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. McGovernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. CrosscupMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API