Weirick v. Hamm Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Plaintiff, a dentist, rented six rooms from defendant in an office building for. use as an office, one of which was occupied by his assistant. Plaintiff requested defendant to redecorate the rooms, and defendant sent a painter in its employ to do the work. The painter painted the walls of some of the rooms, and on a day when plaintiff’s assistant was absent painted the floor of his room. The paint used made the floor as slippery as a coating of grease. The painter left the room to get more paint. While he was absent plaintiff, who did not know that the floor had been painted,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Checkley v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Clarke v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Henry v. Mansfield Beauty Academy, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.