Legal Opinion
In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 2007No. A05-2550PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Judge.
In this certiorari proceeding, relator challenges the amount of a compensation award ordered by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission) pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 216B (2006) to compensate an electric utility for territory it annexed as provided by law. Relator argues that the Commission’s order (1) was arbitrary and capricious and not supported by substantial evidence; and (2) was unconstitutional. We affirm.
FACTS
The City of Grand Rapids provides electricity to the area within its municipal boundaries through the Grand Rapids Public Utilities Commission…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas UtilitiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the City of Redwood FallsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008