Legal Opinion
In Re the City of Redwood Falls
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 2008No. A07-1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Relator City of Redwood Falls (the city) challenges a compensation order issued by respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (the commission). Because we conclude that the commission erred in ordering compensation with respect to relator’s wastewater treatment facility, but observe no error in the commission’s calculation of compensation due for other, annexed areas, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
FACTS
This appeal arises from a dispute over the compensation due in relation to a municipal acquisition of utility property under Minn.Stat. § 216B.44 (2006). In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Twin Ports Convalescent, Inc. v. Minnesota State Board of HealthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re the Complaint Regarding the Annexation of a Portion of the Service Territory of People's Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Moorhead v. Red River Valley Cooperative Power Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012