Legal Opinion
John Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 2016No. A15-1438PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOOTEN, Judge.
Following a bench trial on appellant-insured’s claim of unreasonable denial of underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 604.18, appellant challenges the district court’s taxable costs award, arguing that the district court misinterpreted the phrase “proceeds awarded” in Minn.Stat. § 604.18, subd. 3(a)(1). We affirm. .
FACTS
After sustaining injuries in an automobile accident and obtaining $100,000 in damages from the at-fault driver’s insurance company, appellant John Wilbur sued his insurer, respondent State Fa'rm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilbur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Dahl v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Space Unlimited LLC v. American Casualty Co of Reading, PADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018